|
Christian Exodus
|
Wyoming House Votes YES on Firearms Protection |
|
|
|
|
Written by Tenth Amendment Center
|
|
Saturday, 02 February 2013 20:40 |
|
In response to current threats from the Federal Government on banning
firearms, firearms accessories and ammunition, States are beginning to
take action to hold the Federal Government to its constitutional limits
under the 2nd Amendment. “A well regulated militia, being necessary to
the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear
arms, shall not be infringed.”
Wyoming Rep. Kendell Kroeker has sponsored and introduced HB0104. the Firearms Protection Act.
Representatives Baker, Burkhart, Jaggi, Miller, Piiparinen, Reeder and
Winters and Senators Dockstader and Hicks have co-sponsered this bill.
Today, HB104 passed the full state house by a vote off 46-13.
Wyoming’s Firearms Protection Act, is “an act relating to firearms;
providing that any federal law which attempts to ban a semi-automatic
firearm or to limit the size of a magazine of a firearm or other
limitation on in this state shall be unenforceable in Wyoming; providing
a penalty; and providing for an effective date.” This act nullifies all
federal laws made after Jan. 1, 2013.
“We need the second amendment because it is the protection for all of
our other rights. Without it, those rights have no protection,” Kroeker
said.
Beyond such statements, the bill backs things up with some teeth by
providing for criminal charges for federal agents who attempt to violate
the proposed state law:
“Any official, agent or employee of the United States government who
enforces or attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule or
regulation of the United States government upon a personal firearm, a
firearm accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured
commercially or privately in Wyoming and that remains exclusively within
the borders of Wyoming shall be guilty of a felony and, upon
conviction, shall be subject to imprisonment for not less than one (1)
year and one (1) day or more than five (5) years, a fine of not more
than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), or both.” Read More
|
|
|
League of the South Statement on Gun Rights |
|
|
|
|
Written by League of the South
|
|
Thursday, 17 January 2013 20:41 |
|
On 16 January 2013, President Barack Obama issued a
series of twenty-three "executive actions" designed to control "gun
violence" in America. The League of the South,
the premier Southern nationalist organization, issued the following
statement from its President, Michael Hill: "We
encourage all Southerners to defend their God-given right to self
defense. To defend oneself and one's family, real property, and rights
presupposes having the means to do so, and in our day that means
firearms ownership and the right to keep and bear such arms whenever and
wherever necessary. We encourage our Southern
State governments--the lesser magistrates--to employ the doctrines of
Nullification, Interposition, and Secession to protect their citizens
from unlawful encroachments by the government of the United States." This
is just the latest example of the abandonment of the principles upon
which government was established on these shores. The Declaration of
Independence clearly established that we as citizens "are endowed by
[our] Creator with certain unalienable Rights" And just as importantly:
"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." Over
the years the primary purpose of government – to guarantee our
God-given rights – has been lost upon the corrupt and power-hungry
officials in Washington, DC. This Founding principle is now looked upon
as "extreme" from both sides of the aisle. Therefore,
should the U.S. government, or our State governments, decide, as did
King George III in 1775, to confiscate our weapons and ammunition, then
like our ancestors we shall have no choice but to declare it an act of
war and meet it with a morally justifiable, righteous, and manly armed
resistance. The only way to stop this madness is
for you--the citizens--to let these corrupt government officials
understand that you are ready to withdraw your consent. We urge you for
the benefit of your children and grandchildren to join with us in the
League of The South. |
|
South Carolina Bill Would Nullify all Presidential Executive Orders Against the Right to Keep and Bear Arms |
|
|
|
|
Written by 10th Amendment Center
|
|
Thursday, 17 January 2013 11:03 |
|
Senator Davis has filed SB 224 which is a Joint Resolution to Nullify Executive Orders
infringing upon the second amendment, and the right to keep and bear
arms. This Joint Resolution has been referred to the Senate Committee of
Judiciary.
SB 224 states, “Any federal executive order restricting, abridging,
or otherwise infringing upon the free exercise of a citizen’s second
amendment right to keep and bear arms is unconstitutional and shall not
be enforced by any federal, state, or local law enforcement agency
within South Carolina.”
Senator Davis referenced District of Columbia v. Heller.
This Supreme Court held that, “the Second Amendment protects an
individual’s right to possess firearms and that the city’s total ban on
handguns, as well as its requirement that firearms in the home be kept
nonfunctional even when necessary for self-defense, violated that
right.”
Also, Senator Davis hold that Executive Orders are not a way to skirt
Congress and enact laws. The purpose of executive orders are “to direct
and manage the operation of the executive branch of the federal
government.”
The president has no constitutional authority to use an executive
order to write laws. Congress is the only entity granted power to make
laws. Read More
|
|
Pine County Sheriff Responds to Second Amendment Freedoms |
|
|
|
|
Written by Northlands News Center
|
|
Wednesday, 16 January 2013 19:45 |
|
I believe that the right to keep and bear firearms is fundamental to
our individual freedom and that firearms are a part of life in our
county. The Federal Government has a constitutional role in the
governance of our republic but the United States of America is a
democratic republic of individual sovereign states. Each state has the
absolute right to establish laws, within the confines of the
constitution which is the supreme law of this republic, to regulate
behavior.
As Sheriff, I swore an oath to follow the Constitution of the
United States and to enforce the laws of the State of Minnesota. I
believe current state law is sufficient to protect the public safety
while providing individuals the right to keep and bear arms.
If the State of Minnesota desires to change current law, then
it must do so through the legitimate process of legislation. In my
opinion it is a moral sin to erode freedom through obscure regulation
and administrative rules. I believe this is also true for both State and
Federal Government.
I do not believe the Federal Government or any individual in
the Federal Government has the right to dictate to the states, counties
or municipalities any mandate, regulation or administrative rule that
violates the United States Constitution or it various amendments. I
would view any such mandate, regulation or administrative rule illegal
and refuse to carry it out.
Robin K. Cole Pine County Sheriff Read More
|
|
Ky. sheriff: You're never going to pull guns out of here |
|
|
|
|
Written by Fox News
|
|
Wednesday, 16 January 2013 13:06 |
|
Jackson County Sheriff Denny Peyman vows that federal officials will not enforce any gun laws that violate the Constitution http://video.foxnews.com/v/2094320101001/ky-sheriff-youre-never-going-to-pull-guns-out-of-here/?intcmp=obnetwork
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3 of 31 |
|
|
Battlefield Band
 Nov.12
 Nov.12
Web Links
- Legal Research (2)
- Similar Sites (2)
- Alternative Currency (1)
Harp of Dixie
|